Saturday, September 27, 2008

Will the Media Please Tell Me What to Think About the Debate I Watched Last Night?


Both campaigns know it is important to tell American voters what to think about the debate they did (or did not) watch last night. As the New York Times notes, there is:

a common belief in presidential politics: That many viewers base their judgment not necessarily on debate performance but on what they read and see in the days
afterward.

So, hopefully lots of people will think for themselves, and not let the pundits or the campaigns do it for them.

However, if you are a political junkie like me, you know that how people perceived the debate will some effect on the outcome of the race, so I've been watching the analysis appearing in the media closely.

A sampling of some of the analysis from the media:
The Next Day, a New Debate on Who Won NYTimes

Friday, September 26, 2008

Debate Time!


Well the debate is about to start - I'm very excited about it! I think Barack Obama will win over a lot of undecided voters tonight. McCain has spent the week contradicting himself, and laying the groundwork for Obama to hammer home the point about McCain not having the judgement and temperment to be president.

Let's see how it turns out...

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Iranian President: 'American empire' nearing its end - CNN.com


U.S. Abortion Rate at 30-Year Low

Interesting trend. Interesting results. Among other things, these results suggest that reducing the number of abortions may be linked to helping people out of poverty and distressed economic situations.

U.S. Abortion Rate at 30-Year Low - US News and World Report

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Did Palin support 'Bridge to Nowhere?' - CNN.com

Did Palin support 'Bridge to Nowhere?'

Yeah, she pretty much did.

Did she tell Congress, "Thanks, but no thanks" as she said in her acceptance speech?

Not really. She kept repeating the story though.

Look hard America, and remember what Thomas Jefferson once said, "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free . . . it expects what never was and never will be."

Initiative 1000 would let patients get help ending their lives | Seattle Times Newspaper

It is called many things: "physician-assisted suicide", "death with dignity", and others. Regardless of what it is called, the law in Oregon that lets doctors prescribe lethal doses of drugs to patients that are terminally ill and wish to end their lives before enduring a long and painful illness, has created a lot of controversy. This November Washington State voters will have the opportunity to vote on a law very similar to Oregon's assisted suicide law.

It is also an excellent case study in conflicting constitutional values. Does a limited government have the right to tell a terminally ill person how they should or should not end their lives? Should inidivdual rights win out over concerns about promoting a "culture of life" and preventing possible abuses of the law by greedy relatives that stand to inherit money? Or is opposing this law what would further the common good?

The Seattle Times did an excellent job of reporting on this initiative in their Sunday paper. Check it out.

Initiative 1000 would let patients get help ending their lives Seattle Times Newspaper

Monday, September 22, 2008

Taxpayers may spend $1 trillion in bailout

Wow! This plan, if enacted, will probably be the largest government intervention in the American economy since the Great Depression. It will certainly be the most expensive in our history. Why is the government considering such action? What is this crisis all about?

The plan proposed by President Bush and backed by many in Congress will give the Treasury Department the authority to spend something in the neighborhood of $700 billion dollars to buy up crappy investments and loans from Wall Street companies that are on the brink of collapse. Basically, these investment companies screwed up, and now the government (and the taxpayers!) are being asked to bail them out. The bad investments made by private individuals and corporations will then be owned by the U.S. government. (That is all of us!)

Why would we do such a thing?

Well, the warnings from D.C. are that the effects of all these companies failing would greatly damage the entire economy, especially the ability to get credit and loans. This would lead to a stronger recession, less jobs, and hurt the nation as a whole. Basically, they say they are acting to promote the common welfare to prevent an economic collapse.

The government has intervened in the economy before, especially during the Great Depression and during the Savings and Loan Crisis of the 1980's. (Remember FDR's bank holiday, and the creation of the National Recovery Agency?)

The problem is that this will be very expensive and no one is really sure how it will work out. It might save us from economic disaster or it could wind up fueling inflation and creating an even larger debt so that the things the Presidential candidates are promising to do might not happen. There will be a lot less money for the government to spend, if this plan is approved by Congress.

And there are fundamental Constitutional questions as well. Should Congress give this much power to the Treasury Department (Executive Branch)? Is this something the Framers of our Constitution would have envisioned the federal government doing? Both left-wing and right-wing commentators have criticized this plan over some of these questions.

Here is a video and some articles you may find helpful:

Taxpayers may spend $1 trillion in bailout - Seattle Times Newspaper

Depressingly familiar: Uncle Sam to the rescue
The stock market plummets, investors pull out money and loans dry up, triggering global financial turmoil. Enter the government, buying...

Policymakers: Congress Must Move Quickly to Avert Damage
Lawmakers Remain Deeply Skeptical of Financial Rescue Plan


Criticism and controversy:
Treasury chief Paulson on verge of historic new powers
The administration's bailout plan would make him temporary overseer of the US financial system.

Cash for Trash - by Paul Krugman
Some skeptics are calling Henry Paulson’s $700 billion rescue plan for the U.S. financial system “cash for trash.” Everyone agrees that something major must be done. But Mr. Paulson is demanding extraordinary power for himself — and for his successor — to deploy taxpayers’ money on behalf of a plan that, as far as I can see, doesn’t make sense.

Senator Chris Dodd: “After reading this proposal, I can only conclude that it is not only our economy that is at risk, Mr. Secretary, but our Constitution, as well.”

Conservatives: 'Take a breath' before passing bailout - CNN

Bailout could boost inflation, sink dollar
Oil and gold surged Monday as investors worried that huge new debts will harm US Treasury's credit standing.

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Thursday, September 04, 2008

In a More Diverse America, A Mostly White Convention - washingtonpost.com

From the Washington Post: In a More Diverse America, A Mostly White Convention - washingtonpost.com

Palin’s Start in Alaska - Not Politics as Usual - NYTimes.com

From National Public Radio:
Assessing Palin's Reformist Record - From NPR: · Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin begins her vice presidential campaign as a self-proclaimed reformer. But as a mayor and as
governor, she defended the pork brought home by Alaska's congressional delegation, and even hired a lobbyist to get more. - Listen to this report - it shows how misleading parts of her speech were.

Palin’s Start in Alaska - Not Politics as Usual - NYTimes.com

Mayor Palin: A Rough Record

And Then There Was One - Thomas Friedman

Palin E-Mails Show Intense Interest in Trooper's Penalty