Showing posts with label 1st Amendment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1st Amendment. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

High Court Rulings on Campaign Spending, Sentencing of Juveniles

Two other important Supreme Court decisions were announced yesterday.  The first upheld the Citizens United decision allowing unlimited corporate campaign donations.  (They struck down a Montana law which restricted campaign donations.)

The second decision by the Court said that it was a violation of the 8th Amendment to sentence juveniles to life imprisonment without a chance of parole.



Sunday, January 01, 2012

Why can't we have civil discourse in our politics?

For those of you thinking about the themes of civil discourse, compromise, political parties, etc. this article just posted by USA Today  is a must-read.  I actually think it is good for everyone to read.

After Giffords shooting, civility still elusive: One year later, Americans and their elected leaders still struggle to show each other respect when opinions differ.

From a previous posting, here are some links that deal with the issue on modern American politics.

President Obama Asks Americans to Reflect on How We Talk to Each Other

Last school year, I showed most of the speech.  If you are interested in watching it, here it is:


University of Arizona to Open Civility Institute - NYTimes.com

http://nicd.arizona.edu/

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/jan-june11/publicmedia_01-13.html?print=

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

WA Legislature Special Session Begins With Turmoil

Monday, the State Legislature was back for a "special session" that was called by Governor Christine Gregoire to deal with the $2 billion dollar budget shortfall.

That is $2 billion more than they expected when they passed the budget in the spring, which already made deep cuts in state government programs such as K-12 education, state universities, and health care services for the state's poorest residents.

So, lots of people showed up to protest the state making any more cuts.  Here was the scene at the State Capitol on Monday:


Last week, Governor Gregoire gave a forceful, and passionate speech urging the legislature to increase the state sales tax by 1/2 cent to cover some of the shortfall.  The legislature can't do that with a simple majority however, so Gregoire has asked them to put it on the ballot as a referendum to be voted on by the people of WA in March.




I'm with the Gregoire on this one, except in my perfect world, the solution would be to institute a state income tax, which would fall most heavily on those able to pay.  A sales tax hurts the poor, unemployed, and lower middle classes much more.

What do you think the government should do?  Do you think the legislature will raise taxes, or make deeper cuts? 

Saturday, November 19, 2011

UC Davis - Police Use Pepper Spray on Passive, Non-Violent student protesters


The video of seemingly indefensible police action:





The police claim they were surrounded and the protesters would not move.  From the CBS news article:
"according to Annette Spicuzza, UC Davis police chief...police used the pepper spray after they were surrounded. Protesters were warned repeatedly beforehand that force would be used if they didn't move, she said.

Meanwhile in Seattle, as a part of the Occupy Seattle protests:
An 84-year-old woman who was pepper sprayed this week at an Occupy Seattle protest said the national attention she received can help the movement's cause. 
This info is taken from an article from CBS news you can connect to here.

Saturday, July 02, 2011

Supreme Court: Violent Video Games Protected by 1st Amendment


California enacted a law in 2005 restricting the sale or rental of violent video games to minors. In a 7-2 decision, the United States struck down that law as a violation of the free expression rights protected in the U.S. Constitution. Do you agree with the Court in this case, or do the representatives of the citizens of California have the right to enact laws they feel will protect young people (without the federal courts intervening)?

You can read the story here: Justices Reject Ban on Violent Video Games for Children

Some editorials which praise the Court's decision:

Editorials | U.S. Supreme Court got it right: Video-game ban restricts free speech


It’s Perverse, but It’s Also Pretend

(The case is Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association.)